Please kick him out

[Francesca]

I want to report a dude called 'EZ' who’s definitely unpleasant and useless for the games. High ping, around 150 and Mynx model.
Probably chatmuted yet.
The fact is that keeps annoying teammates by shooting nonstop rockets, then changes nick to include specific insult.
Makes the game unplayable.

[adminless]

yes, that guy is chat banned already so if I pretty much permanently chat ban this guy it will be for a reason as usual thus I just updated his chat ban to a actual game ban now, fair enough. thanks for report.

[.WTF!P0rsche?!]

yes, that guy is chat banned already so if I pretty much permanently chat ban this guy it will be for a reason as usual thus I just updated his chat ban to a actual game ban now, fair enough. thanks for report.

I’ve noticed that this player sometimes steals unfrozen items by pushing them away with a rocket. (They can’t give an exact guarantee that he does this on purpose, but it’s happened more than once). He also spams information in the console by changing his nickname from one to another in a short time. Sometimes it’s harmonious and looks like a joke — if the chat is empty — but sometimes it really looks like spam. Overall, I think he needs to be told to spam less by changing his nickname. And if he really sometimes deliberately pushes away from unfreezing, then tell him that this is not allowed, otherwise it may lead to certain consequences. Overall, the player’s behavior is satisfactory, with a minor downside, as I see it.
(As for my own behavior, it has improved; I’m even playing with a banned chat on purpose now — I feel good and I like it better this way, but even when I play with a unbanned chat, I still behave normally. For the last two years, I haven’t said anything bad to anyone, only positive vibrations like words "Monique i love you" "Moni n1 pure pro" "Moni, hi, everyone’s going to Glacius, when are you and I going to Glacius?" "arr Pirat NS!" and another).

[adminless]

hahahaha yes P0rsche, don't worry, we appreciate your efforts of bettering yourself. truth to be told, some similar competitive players that always ran their mounth like you actually requested me themsleved to be indeed chat banned as they played and enjoyed better the game like that without always the constant heat of the chat so it doesn't surprise me.

[Francesca]

Lol
I don’t want to see EZ around again. The facts are concrete, while the words are carried away by the wind...
Keep him banned and everyone stays happy.

[.WTF!P0rsche?!]

Lol
I don’t want to see EZ around again. The facts are concrete, while the words are carried away by the wind...
Keep him banned and everyone stays happy.

You have a cool avatar)

[Francesca]

[adminless]

ah yes, that's well know long time trouble maker ZmOky. ban just updated now, thanks for report and sorry for the inconvenience.

[^Walnut*]

ah yes, that's well know long time trouble maker ZmOky. ban just updated now, thanks for report and sorry for the inconvenience.

Does he play under names EZ, MF and 420? He was here btw few hours ago on unfreeze 1 also mocking other players with his name. He takes names like "Christina dog shit camper" for example!

[Francesca]

It doesn't matter that he's chatbanned, but we don't wanna see him there again. Not enough for a paeceful and entertaining game.

[adminless]

@walnut yes that's the same ZmOky guy that has been around pretty much for a decade already and that at the beginning it was just a funny random troll with his over the top reactions but that it's clear that with the passing of time it has become toxic. as I just said, I just reviewed and updated that earlier so if anything just let me know.

[Francesca]

Got it. Proof that people do not change their flaws especially over the course of decades. Turned into an old fool with white hair...
Haha

[.WTF!P0rsche?!]

Got it. Proof that people do not change their flaws especially over the course of decades. Turned into an old fool with white hair...
Haha

I don't think EZ is an interesting enough player to warrant so much attention, although some of his criticism may actually have some truth to it rather than being complete nonsense. Let's also mention his positive qualities. For example, he never sits still and doesn't waste other players' time; he plays quite actively and plays a lot. I've never seen him cheat the gameplay by hiding too much, and I've never seen him ruin the gameplay. He almost always chooses an offensive strategy, which is great, since these are Quake 3 Unfreeze training games, not Counter-Strike or a championship. His toxicity level is approximately moderate. You'd be better off coming up with a condition to resolve the situation where neither team can clearly understand who's playing attack and who's playing defense. Playing defense is always more advantageous, so since there's no specific condition, both teams can play defense, and rounds can last quite a long time, too long. And players like EZ and others don't like this, which is why they express their opinions through toxicity towards those players who violate this factor-condition. Now here's a question for you: what do you want by eliminating active attacking players? Do you want only defensive players left? Then you yourself won't play this kind of gameplay. You're essentially destroying yourselves in this way. I believe players like EZ and Mr. K have some truth to their criticism and are aimed at improving the gameplay. In this case, it's aimed at encouraging players to play more actively if they see that they're ignoring the unresolved condition (who's attacking and who's defending).

[adminless]

harassment is harassment and it has nothing to do with 'encouragement' so don't mistake and try to mask one with the other. you just need to look at the guy nicks history over the years to easily tell the guy is a menace. yes, as usual every one has opinions and everyone is welcome to share them but always in a respectful, meaningful and constructive manner so once again don't try to mask that with plain bullying and forcing a issue. this is the same kind of guy that exactly just as you flipped over any random shit for ages with no end and completely loses it over any normal online public gaming situation and even if the initial premises could have some root of slight meaning as you're putting it in no way, shape or form justify nor allow the completely out of proportion reactions as I said. matter of fact, it just becomes pretty clear they just become merely a mean to channel all that disproportional and underlying rage rather than any kind of reason to begin with (i.e. you're not really raging at something, you're just looking for something to rage at). as I said, this guy exactly as you just used to rage at any random shit for ages until it obviously stopped being funny and he already had more than enough chances and years to at least moderate himself a bit more but instead the guy just keeps getting reported over and over again.

[^Walnut*]

Got it. Proof that people do not change their flaws especially over the course of decades. Turned into an old fool with white hair...
Haha

I don't think EZ is an interesting enough player to warrant so much attention, although some of his criticism may actually have some truth to it rather than being complete nonsense. Let's also mention his positive qualities. For example, he never sits still and doesn't waste other players' time; he plays quite actively and plays a lot. I've never seen him cheat the gameplay by hiding too much, and I've never seen him ruin the gameplay. He almost always chooses an offensive strategy, which is great, since these are Quake 3 Unfreeze training games, not Counter-Strike or a championship. His toxicity level is approximately moderate. You'd be better off coming up with a condition to resolve the situation where neither team can clearly understand who's playing attack and who's playing defense. Playing defense is always more advantageous, so since there's no specific condition, both teams can play defense, and rounds can last quite a long time, too long. And players like EZ and others don't like this, which is why they express their opinions through toxicity towards those players who violate this factor-condition. Now here's a question for you: what do you want by eliminating active attacking players? Do you want only defensive players left? Then you yourself won't play this kind of gameplay. You're essentially destroying yourselves in this way. I believe players like EZ and Mr. K have some truth to their criticism and are aimed at improving the gameplay. In this case, it's aimed at encouraging players to play more actively if they see that they're ignoring the unresolved condition (who's attacking and who's defending).

That doesn't matter in this rn, he is stealing ppl's names and making others look bad!