UnFreeZe Super League 2023, First Leg

[adminless]

well then I guess that I can probably just note that by now for the next Sunday 22 night and let's also see what diablo has to say about it. in any case, I believe that you can at least start by picking two maps from q3dm8, storm3tourney1, pro-nodm9, phantq3dm1_rev, pro-q3tourney7, bloodcovenant, pro-dcmap7, charon3dm9 for your second game against them within these days.

[^Walnut*]

You can also pick the same maps right if you want? So would I be able to pick pro-nodm9 and q3tourney7 again or is this not possible? (Not that I want to pick those right away, we first need to discuss about that)

[adminless]

yes, all the fights are independent (included second legs) so you can chose whatever (available) you want for any fight although in most cases (i.e. unless you all are uncontested, undefeated, undisputed on those maps which exactly what the fair-play balance rule is there to prevent) playing all the time the same maps it probably won't be the best idea. in my opinion, the smart is adapting/optimizing your strategies taking in consideration also your opponent abilities and history, at least that's what I weight in when picking overrules (no, I don't pick those at "random") and generally overruled fights haven't done that bad. in any case the new "fair queue" tier format should guarantee that at least a significant amount of different maps gets played over the season anyway not just the same 7-8 basically so that should be no problem. one way or another you're also gonna need to play/learn more maps.

[redrum]

Adminless, we are the same. No Thursday. I want exclude Wednesday today, because one of us has regular job that time, every week. I mean Thursday + Wednesday - no time for him.

[adminless]

I guess you meant Tuesday like ass. ok then I guess that the next Sunday 22 should work for both of you, right? as the Wednesdays, ok, I updated the calendar now so no of your fight should fall on a Wednesday then.

[redrum]

Ok, sorry, if they cant play Tuesday we off course understand. For us Thursday + Wednesday is no go day. We have no problem with Tuesday for future matches with teams who will agree.

[adminless]

ok, no problem, thanks for the update then I just updated now the calendar with the Tuesdays as the default date for your team. btw then the Sunday 22 of October of 2023 21:00 CEST date for your next week fight against ASS works for your team?

[adminless]

breaking a casual immortal clan has imposed themselves on a flawless 20:0 victory against newcomers diablo on their debut, fire!

[^Walnut*]

breaking a casual immortal clan has imposed themselves on a flawless 20:0 victory against newcomers diablo on their debut, fire!

Can you exclude Tuesday in our case for future fights? And I reacted to this message, because out of curiousity, what do you mean with the 20:0?

[^Walnut*]

And can you maybe also take Friday and Saturday in consideration for the fight against DT? I don't know yet if I have enough for Sunday!

[PacMan]

breaking a casual immortal clan has imposed themselves on a flawless 20:0 victory against newcomers diablo on their debut, fire!

Immortal? Is who as in name tag the old DC clan?

DT is diablo right ?

[Edversion]

Yes

[adminless]

ok, everything updated already with this night frag fest. I think that this is a very good example why the fair-play balance rule is there for as well as the (also "controversial") autobalance in-game and why they are necessary, I don't think I really need to comment much about it, that should make it very clear by itself. to some extend without my involvement and without all those regulations and mechanics that's pretty much how this would look like, I assume nobody, not even them (i.e. miroslav, ixsy etc), really want that. what people really want is fighting people on their skill level or similar and for that to happen fair-play balance rules must be taken into account and enforced if necessary when forming the teams otherwise it just doesn't work for anybody. that being said, I hope nobody take it personally but obviously the fair-play balance is applied for the top teams as to keep the dispute for the first place at least entertaining not the dispute for the last place. in any case, ggs, and great effort from diablo, looking forward having you on the next match and may be even enjoying another hot 6vs5 off-the-record game after finishing the business. as said, for the future I think that you can probably recruit a few top players to raise the level and it's unfortunate that there's no more beginners teams around willing to get involved. I wouldn't mind having divisions or small events/cups given the case.

@walnut 20:0 means 10:0 on the first and 10:0 of the second without even forming with their top lineup for immortal. that's a unsolvable request, I can not match you up with diablo on the second leg in a Tuesday (as they requested) and not in a Tuesday (as you are requesting) at the same time. all the rest by now seems ok (actually at the moment none of your matches were set for a Tuesday in the calendar). for the rest oKo just declined the two fights offer for the next Thursday before so that means the Thursday they will fight ilm instead that it's on schedule so it has preference beside they already have confirmed that. they offered instead the Friday so I remind you here once again that if that day you have at least five of the registered players available regardless of who they are at the moment you are obliged to take such date. they also picked overkill, pro-q3tourney2 and focal_132p, bal3dm3 so let me know what you prefer from those and also specifically what dates your team can play, things like may be doesn't work, I need commitment and to know for a fact. it's been like a week already and you're the only team who hasn't been able to work out any date. no matter who your representative is, season after season you keep pulling off the same stuff and that's not acceptable. the usual dates at what this was scheduled to be played were all clearly announced so it was your sole duty and responsibility to recruit players that in the next months would have been available and willing to participate accordingly and not to register unavailable players and/or players simply interested in play once in a while here and there.

[adminless]

just as a public reminder for everyone involved here this is the current noted status and list of pending tasks of the ongoing fights to complete this weekend:

• Week 1
  • oKo Clan VS ASS Clan (Friday 20 of October of 2023 20:30 CEST)
    • status: oko declined the Thursday (as to not fight twice in the same night) and offered the next Friday as new date therefor at the wait of ass to confirm such date or clearly provide a alternative date/solution. additionally at the wait of ass to ultimately decide what they prefer to play from oko picks overkill, pro-q3tourney2 and focal_132p, bal3dm3 within the next 24 hours the latest as to finally leave that set. have failed such deadline will mean that by tomorrow night I'll overrule/set that.
• Week 2
  • ILM Clan VS oKo Clan (Thursday 19 of October of 2023 21:15 CEST)
    • status: fight already confirmed for the next Thursday night. oko already picked bloodcovenant, storm3tourney1 so now just waiting for ilm to pick/set the rest.
  • Team Community VS Immortal Clan (Wednesday 18 of October of 2023 21:00 CEST)
    • status: waiting for input and picks from both teams already to leave that set within this week.
  • Diablo Team VS ASS Clan (Friday 20 of October of 2023 21:30 CEST)
    • status: even by now it's not even clear when this could be played if anything at all therefor if ass finally take the next Friday date against oko I propose to set this just afterwards. diablo players are well known as the glacius regulars (which main event is Friday nights) so I guess that should probably work for them. additionally waiting for picks already, more specifically, for ass to pick two maps from q3dm8, storm3tourney1, pro-nodm9, phantq3dm1_rev, pro-q3tourney7, bloodcovenant, pro-dcmap7, charon3dm9.

as said, despite the broken down procedure that will apply in case of disputes as to avoid deadline issues later on under normal circumstances it's strongly encouraged for the teams to submit their picks once a fight gets established rather than engaging on any kind of delays.

[redrum]

Hello Adminless. Yesterday 6 members DT entered game with the best group around here. Everyone was hyped for game. All of them keep their promised words, were right on time on server, played two games /3 off record/. The only player with turney experience was Fran. Im happy about everyone. Noobhunter and abo. Noobhunter was looking for opportunity to play here on forum, I saw his chat messeages in game chat, I forgot to change diskord accounts names with him. Now he dont need to wait another 6 months to get some first taste of turney.

Aboba's after yesterday outcome words are trainning tranning trainning, Edi is all-in IMHO. Franni is back, Mac, Cat overally Im glad

The third off record game was nice and wise move. It helped boost morale. Thanks.

We got nice feetback from ASS, Immortal, OKO members, advices/trainning sessions offers for better outcome for next matches. Nice invitation from them.

"I wouldn't mind having divisions or small events/cups given the case." adminless

This thought I have throught whole week, maybe more. When I talk to people about posibility to enter 5vs5 turney games, I see desire to enter, but mostly with "but Im noob" . I think its possible to created three six members teams, 2 atleast right now and have some small B class championship.