- "From my point of view as a player, if I was in the position of the lower teams for example, it would just be the most exciting thing for me to play against the better teams and try to beat them, figure out tactics on them, strengthen the team and try to win the league" as I wrote before if that's what really interest you you have it pretty easy, start leading by example instead and join dt for example and show before you speak otherwise it just come fake and hypocrite as you precisely had that chance you're generously conceding to others with over and threw it away to instead become that better team now.
- "We saw a lot of interesting games, a lot of interesting results, surprising performances" none of them involving you and that's exactly what shouldn't happen.
- "Considering that only 2 tier 1 players could enter the game" that's bullshit, that's micromanaging and handicapping the teams and that's something I'm not gonna do in that form beside exceptional circumstances as that's indeed arbitrary since it wouldn't even affect all the teams the same (only those overpowered). if the rule is make that then some players can not play at the same time for whatever the reason is as you are assuming this then such team needs to be properly registered accordingly like everyone else.
- "Your regulation will kill another team and maybe more" yeah I think that you're finally starting to get it, sure I'll try my best to effectively kill any team that forms that it's proven to have become overpowering and ruing a fair and exciting competition. before you there was wtf btw which where all this started and btw what you just succeeded so don't take it personal and think that you have been the first affected by this as you have not and probably in case this happens to keep running you won't be the last either.
- "Like if I left, where would I play to meet the regulatory quota?" I think I just made it clear before you could for example team up with miro in dt and then lead by example instead of just coming here with big words or even to team community. real example (it would have to be played obviously but initially that looks pretty fair to me, current top five versus top five no rotations, no bullshit, no anything):
- Immortal Clan:
- olc: 1043.6 points
- kf: 970.9 points
- shantu: 920.5 points
- crm: 889.9 points
- viper: 844.2 points
- average (fair): 933.8 points
- Team Community:
- heero: 1028.9 points
- aimer: 953.7 points
- fau: 941.4 points
- ribx: 891.1 points
- mwhq3: 877.6 points
- average (fair): 938.5 points
- "I don't find the difference of 50 points per team very significant" the difference quoted there is actually per player instead so per team it gets later on amplified at least by a factor of five (5vs5) if not more as you're even stating yourself (i.e. it's not linear, better players make even better teams together, specially when they don't rotate etc etc)
- "It might be worth adding more variables to those stats to give a more objective perspective to the individual rankings" I posted already like half a dozen stats and all point in the same direction so I'm not gonna post anymore. I simply quoted those specific ones as that specific metric seemed to have caught your eye.
- "The difference from me is a rank of 106. Is that a lot?" it's a lot as you're implying yourself you don't have more than to look at the rest of the metrics to realize that (ex. score per death 1.71 vs 1.14, +50% is that clear of a difference enough for you?)
- "you don't listen" I think you have brought this other times and I think that I still have this on the back of my head that you brought it the past season in the form that "I want others to respect me but I can't expect that when I don't respect others" or some non sense like that so i think that this time I'm gonna answer you that. first of all, I do listen and that's exactly why this forum is here for and tell it otherwise it's plain obvious that it's not the case and with that follows the second thing is that you confuse respecting someone opinion with actually sharing it. those are two completely different things, you just assume that because someone doesn't share your opinion is just not respecting it. I respect and encourage most feedback (obviously always to some meaningful extend) it just happen that most often than not I simply disagree but that doesn't take anything away from it. that's just the way it's.